On the outside of the battery case is stamped 57 kWh of capacity. Inside the pack, the battery modules each have a capacity rating stamped on them as well.
There are 10 battery modules, 8 of them are marked 5.94 kWh each and 2 of them are marked 4.75 kWh each.
8 x 5.94 kWh = 47.52 kWh
2 x 4.75 kWh = 9.5 kWh
For a total of = 57.02 kWh
So which one is it? 60 kWh of usable capacity or 57 kWh of rated capacity, I am at a loss over this wide discrepancy.
Energy to re-charge vs. energy the car recorded as discharged
3/27/2018 Re-charged 59.0 kWh but Bolt recorded 57.1 kWh consumed. 96.7% charge efficiency? (Warmer battery needed less conditioning?)
3/23/2018 Re-charged 51.7 kWh but Bolt recorded 49.4 kWh consumed. 95.3% charge efficiency?
In both instances I am using a slower 5.7 kW charge rate, (This Juicebox has been intentionally throttled back to minimize resistive losses in charging cables).
I suspect the Bolt’s energy consumption numbers are a little on the high side, or else it’s chemistry is a lot more efficient at charging. Typical charge efficiency is on the order of 85-90% efficient.
Thermal Management:
Because the Chevy Bolt thermally manages its battery pack, I suspect that its life will be greatly extended. While a Nissan Leaf battery pack that is not thermally managed, is pretty much toast after 100,000 miles or so. The Bolt should be able to do much better.
Hypothetically supposed you charged the Bolt’s battery every 180 miles. If the battery has a usable lifespan of 3500-5000 cycles, we can estimate that the Bolt battery will last for 180 x 3500 = 630,000 to 900,000 miles. At this rate, the chassis will rust out long before the battery needs to be replaced.
If the Bolt is what Chevrolet can do when their heart isn’t even in EVs yet, I can’t wait for what the future holds for EVs once the rest of the auto industry finally comes on board?